APPENDIX D: RESEARCH INSTRUMENT 4, (1)
| The questions for this instrument can be found in appendix A- 60, (page 409). Abbreviations refer to university depts., and are explained in appendix A -69 (page 415). Numbers on the y-axis of appendices D- 78 - 108 refer to the score range for each item (minimum 0, maximum 5). Numbers below the abbreviations refer to the actual scores for each item. In June and December 1998, the number of participants was 3,179: 1,751 (Freshmen) + 1,428 (Sophomores). Junior students were not part of the language programme at that time (cf. appendix A-48, page 402).
|
||
|
|
ITEM 1: THE SYLLABUS WAS HELPFUL IN HELPING STUDENTS UNDERSTAND THE WHOLE COURSE. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 1: THE SYLLABUS WAS HELPFUL IN HELPING STUDENTS UNDERSTAND THE WHOLE COURSE. DECEMBER 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 2: THE TEACHER CLEARLY EXPLAINED THE GOALS OF THE COURSE. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 2: THE TEACHER CLEARLY EXPLAINED THE GOALS OF THE COURSE. DECEMBER 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 3: THE TEACHER HELPED THE STUDENTS BY EXPLAINING EVERYTHING SYSTEMATICALLY. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 3: THE TEACHER HELPED THE STUDENTS BY EXPLAINING EVERYTHING SYSTEMATICALLY. DECEMBER 1998. |
|
|
|
ITEM 4: THE TEACHER TRIED TO MOTIVATE THE STUDENTS. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 4: THE TEACHER TRIED TO MOTIVATE THE STUDENTS. DECEMBER 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 5: THE TEACHER DID HIS/HER BEST FOR THE CLASS. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 5: THE TEACHER DID HIS/HER BEST FOR THE CLASS. DECEMBER 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 6: THE TEACHER PREPARED FOR THE CLASS THOROUGHLY AND EXPERTLY. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 6: THE TEACHER PREPARED FOR THE CLASS THOROUGHLY AND EXPERTLY. DECEMBER 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 7: THE TEACHER WAS PUNCTUAL AND KEPT TO THE SCHEDULE. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 7: THE TEACHER WAS PUNCTUAL AND KEPT TO THE SCHEDULE. DECEMBER 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 8: THE TEACHER RESPECTED AND WAS OPEN TO THE OPINIONS AND REQUESTS OF THE STUDENTS. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 8: THE TEACHER RESPECTED AND WAS OPEN TO THE OPINIONS AND REQUESTS OF THE STUDENTS. DECEMBER 1998 |
|
| APPENDIX C58: RESEARCH INSTR. 4: UNIV. QUESTIONNAIRE, 1998, (5)
|
||
|
|
ITEM 9: THE TEXTBOOK AND TEACHING MATERIALS WERE APPROPRIATE FOR THE STUDENTS. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 9: THE TEXTBOOK AND TEACHING MATERIALS WERE APPROPRIATE FOR THE STUDENTS. DECEMBER 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 10: THE EVALUATION METHOD WAS APPROPRIATE FOR THE COURSE. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 10: THE EVALUATION METHOD WAS APPROPRIATE FOR THE COURSE. DECEMBER 1998 |
|
| APPENDIX C58: RESEARCH INSTRUMENT 4: UNIVERSITY QUESTIONNAIRE, 1998, (6) |
||
|
|
ITEM 11: THE TEACHER GAVE THE STUDENTS SUFFICIENT INFORMATION IN ADVANCE ABOUT THE EVALUATION CRITERIA AND METHODS. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 11: THE TEACHER GAVE THE STUDENTS SUFFICIENT INFORMATION IN ADVANCE ABOUT THE EVALUATION CRITERIA AND METHODS. DECEMBER 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 12: THE STUDENTS FEEL THAT THE COURSE HELPED THEM TO BECOME MORE INTERESTED IN THE SUBJECT MATTER THAN BEFORE. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 12: THE STUDENTS FEEL THAT THE COURSE HELPED THEM TO BECOME MORE INTERESTED IN THE SUBJECT MATTER THAN BEFORE. DECEMBER 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 13: THE STUDENTS FEEL THAT THEY LEARNED NEW THINGS DURING THE COURSE. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 13: THE STUDENTS FEEL THAT THEY LEARNED NEW THINGS DURING THE COURSE. DECEMBER 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 14: THE STUDENTS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE COURSE. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 14: THE STUDENTS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE COURSE. DECEMBER 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 15: THE STUDENTS FEEL THAT THE COURSE WAS OF VALUE TO THEM AND THAT IT WAS WORTH TAKING. JUNE 1998 |
|
|
|
ITEM 15: THE STUDENTS FEEL THAT THE COURSE WAS OF VALUE TO THEM AND THAT IT WAS WORTH TAKING. DECEMBER 1998 |
|