TABLE LX: ANU STUDENT EVALUATION INSTRUMENT, 1998.
*All 15 items in the instrument were in Korean (though presented here in English), and students responded on a 0 – 5 Likert scale ("0Ħħ = total disagreement).

Qu. #

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11


12


13

14

15

The syllabus was helpful in helping students understand the whole course.

The teacher clearly explained the goals of the course.

The teacher helped the students by explaining everything systematically.

The teacher tried to motivate the students.

The teacher did his/her best for the class.

The teacher prepared for the class thoroughly and expertly.

The teacher was punctual and kept to the schedule.

The teacher respected and was open to the opinions and requests of the students.

The textbook and teaching materials were appropriate for the students.

The evaluation method was appropriate for the course.

The teacher gave the students sufficient information in advance about the evaluation criteria and methods.

The students feel that the course helped them to become more interested in the subject matter than before.

The students feel that they learned new things during the course.

The students were satisfied with the course.

The students feel that the course was of value and that it was worth taking.