| Names
of |
1 |
2 |
|||||
| 3 |
4 |
||||||
| Date: |
|||||||
|
Poor, ‚ Not very good, ƒOK, „Good, … Excellent |
|
‚ |
ƒ |
„ |
… |
||
| 1. The presentation materials were well-prepared. |
|||||||
| 2. The presentation had been well-rehearsed. |
|||||||
| 3. This presentation was enjoyable to watch. |
|||||||
| 4. This presentation was well-organized (logical plan). |
|||||||
| 5. This presentation was well-managed (time-keeping). |
|||||||
| 6. This presentation used interesting materials. |
|||||||
| 7. This presentation used audio/visual aids effectively. |
|||||||
| 8. This presentation used the classroom space well. |
|||||||
| 9. The presenters each spoke for 2 minutes or more. |
|||||||
| 10. The presenters used relevant vocabulary (range). |
|||||||
| 11. The presenters used checking language (range, comprehension). |
|||||||
| 12. Communication flowed at smooth pace (ease of speech). |
|||||||
| 13. The presenters were cheerful and enthusiastic (attitude). |
|||||||
| 14. The presenters were confident (attitude). |
|||||||
| 15. The presenters spoke clearly (delivery). |
|||||||
| 16. The presenters communicated with few errors (accuracy). |
|||||||
| 17. The presenters interacted with the audience (interaction). |
|||||||
| 18. The presenters used body language (gestures, eye contact). |
|||||||
| 19. The presenters invited questions from the audience. |
|||||||
| 20. The presenters answered questions clearly (logical explanations). |
|||||||
| Total/100 |
|||||||
| Comments:
|