Albany
Park Multicultural Academy
Socratic Seminar
Evaluation of Seminar-By Seminar Leader
Criterion
I: Participation
Score____
- 0 - Does
not participate
- 1 - One
way communication - Talks but does not listen
- 2 - Two
way communication, shows openness
- 3 - Asks
others to clarify and substantiate statements
- 4 - Participates
fully, courteous to others, attempts to get others to participate, does
not monopolize
Criterion
II: Substantiation
Score____
- 0 - Does
not support opinions
- 1 - Attempts
to support opinions, but more from experience than from the text
- 2 - Supports
from text as well as from experience, but examples only rarely show
real understanding
- 3 - Supports
opinions with evidence from text and from experience, sometimes showing
understanding of the text and relevance of the issue
- 4 - Supports
opinions with evidence from the text and from experience, showing understanding
of the text and relevance of the issue
Criterion
III: Thinking About My Thinking (Metacognition)
Score____
- 0 - Does
not utilize self monitoring or apply logical thinking
- 1 - Attempts
to solve breakdown in thought process but shows confusion in making
an hypothesis
- 2 - Applies
logic to problems, has difficulty drawing conclusions, uses deductive
reasoning, works to check hypothesis
- 3 - Analyses
hypothesis but does not apply logical processing in drawing conclusions
- 4 - Displays
problem solving strategy, shows ability to remediate breakdown in thinking,
questions own ideas
Total
Score:______
Grading
Scale:
A
= 10 - 12; B
= 6 - 9; C
= 2 - 5; D
= 1; F
= 0
|
Two of these
criteria are detailed below:
Socratic
Seminar
Criteria
I: Participation
None |
Moving |
In Progress |
Meets |
Exceeds |
does
not participate |
one
way communication
(I talk but I don't listen) |
two
way communication, shows openness |
asks
others to clarify and substantiate statements |
participates
fully, courteous to others, attempts to get quiet students to participate,
does not monopolize conversation |
Criteria
II: Thinking About My Thinking (Metacognition)
None |
Moving |
In Progress |
Meets |
Exceeds |
does
not utilize self monitoring or apply logical thinking |
attempts
to solve breakdown in thought process but shows confusion in making
an hypothesis |
applies
logic to problems, has difficulty drawing conclusions, uses deductive
reasoning, works to check hypothesis |
analyzes
hypothesis but does not apply logical processing in drawing conclusions |
displays
problem-solving strategy, shows ability to remediate breakdown in
thinking, questions own ideas |
|